Many of the 'successes' in treating cancer via conventional medicine and their bag of tricks, other than the very few that do respond more readily, are cancers that very likely would not have resulted in death. The most recent revelation by the Australian Oncologists, which barely received mention in the United States, again highlights the failures of this system..........their words, not mine.
Many of the so-called successes have to do with the very misleading 5 year survival rate which is still being heralded as an accomplishment though it has been discredited over the past few years. The trickery used in this scheme heralds the numbers now surviving beyond the five years and these are considered cures. What they do not tell you is that with modern technology cancers are being detected earlier. When one adds those earlier diagnosis years to the five year survival rate, one must come to the conclusion people are living longer.........but they aren't.
Additionally, the percentages used in 'response' to treatment are even more misleading than the five year survival rates. There is the Relative vs. Absolute benefit. For example: If a drug results in 5 people out of 100 supposedly benefiting from a treatment, no matter how long, one has a 5% benefit. Now along comes an added treatment and 7 people seem to benefit. To me that's 7% but what the schemers use is the difference between the 5% and 7% which is only 2% but they claim it is really a 40% improvement. That is how a perceived 2% benefit is turned into a 40% benefit. Because many physicians simply do not have time to study, while making lots of money and trying to enjoy life and their families, they often do not know the difference either. Fortunately there are honest physicians that decry this kind of fakery..................but not enough of them! When the Oncologist throws these percentages at you, are they real or are they 'relative' benefits???????????????????????
For those terrible cancers, the ones we fear the most, along with metastasis, conventional medicine does not offer what they claim.............it just seems so.
A statement in a recent report I read stunned me. It was for medical professionals, not Cancer-cured list members and it stated, "All treatment for metastasised breast cancer IS palliative". Scary isn't it? This from inside the medical community.
Joe C.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cancercured/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cancercured/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:cancercured-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:cancercured-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cancercured-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar