Excellent post! I agree with you almost entirely. While in this area
it may be a good time to reiterate the experiment performed by Drs.
Rife & Kendall. Using Rife's superb microscope, they placed in a
culture dish the B. coli bacteria, a common and harmless organism. By
slightly altering the pH over successive time periods of 36 hours,
they were able to observe multiple pleomorphic transformations into
several distinctive diseases including sarcoma and carcinoma (cancers)
and back again to the starting B. coli. It was the shift in the
biological terrain that produced the offending organisms which Dr.
Rife then named BX and BY.
This experiment was somewhat repeated in modern times and was
published in the February 2004 (Volume 4)issue of 'The Lancet
Oncology' starting on page 63.
"Clare Sansom announced that the Cancer organism identified 70 years
ago by Dr. Rife, which he called BX and BY, were successfully
isolated having been DNA sequenced by British researchers and was
found to be Bacillus Licheniformis, a soil organism that is
pleomorphic and was observed to change into rods, cocci, and fungus-
like forms."
The interesting fact about this experiment was that each form, though
different in shape all had identical DNA signatures!
Furthermore, Dr. Lida Mattman in her classic work 'Cell Wall
Deficient Forms: Stealth Pathogens' stated that approximately 30% of
the human population were found to harbor the above mentioned
organism.
You wrote: "Contributing cause? Yes.....the absolute cause? No."
I never meant to imply an absolute cause of this disease. One must
look at tumor formation as an end stage of lengthy process and not
the start of the disease. Far too many people identify a tumor as
being the loci of the cancer, it clearly is not. The real issue isn't
so much what the cell does to become cancerous, it is far more
important to focus on the environmental factors that cause the cell
to malfunction in the first place. Cancer is a normal and an expected
condition when the body is in a putrid state whether it is total full
body humor contamination or a congestion in a venal shunt or
capillary. It is the poor environment in which the cell is in
proximity with that causes it to shift its metabolic function as a
survival mechanism and it is the toxins produced and the cytokines
that are generated that calls upon Progenitor cryptocides to morph
into the BX and BY as Dr. Rife so brilliantly described.
I firmly believe that the cure for this disease is to alter its
living environment. Attempts to kill the organism have always failed
because Progenitor cryptocides, in its cyst form, is indestructible.
No amount of heat, radiation or chemical toxicity can snuff it out.
It is found everywhere, even in newly formed volcanic rock. PC is
Nature's scavenger. Does its presence produce the disease or is it
the result of it? Does it matter? No. The reason being that it can be
shifted by altering its terrain and this is why the dietary/hygiene
approach to treatment works where all other methods ultimately fail.
Dr. Warburg's speech to the Nobel Laureates sums it up nicely.
http://www.stopcancer.com/ottolecture2.htm
"Cancer, above all other diseases, has countless secondary causes.
Almost anything can cause cancer. But, even for cancer, there is only
one prime cause. The prime cause of cancer is the replacement of the
respiration of oxygen ... in normal body cells by fermentation of
sugar."
"These proposals are in no way utopian. On the contrary, they may be
realized by everybody, everywhere, at any hour. Unlike the prevention
of many other diseases, the prevention of cancer requires no
government help, and not much money."
"Nobody today can say that one does not know what the prime cause of
cancer is. On the contrary, there is no disease whose prime cause is
better known, so that today ignorance is no longer an excuse for
avoiding measures for prevention. That the prevention of cancer will
come there is no doubt. But how long prevention will be avoided
depends on how long the prophets of agnosticism will succeed in
inhibiting the application of scientific knowledge in the cancer
field. In the meantime, millions of men and women must die of cancer
unnecessarily." Otto Warburg, June 30,1966 Lindau, Germany.
--- In cancercured, "JCastron" wrote:
>Some of the names, such as J.H. Tilden, M.D. and others, believed
cancer to be an 'End Stage Pathology' with no one cause.
> Contributing cause? Yes.............the absolute cause? No.
>For something to be considered a 'cause' it must be the reason the
end result happens all the time. We know people that smoke, eat
poorly, and yet never develop cancer in their life while others
do. Then we have the person that eats 'well' according to our
standards and they develop cancer, the word develop probably a good
way to explain this curse. Vegetarians develop cancer.
> Meat eaters and non-meat eaters develop cancer and perhaps the meat-
eater victim has also added a number of other factors that have
a 'causal' relationship........
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cancercured/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cancercured/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:cancercured-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:cancercured-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cancercured-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar