actually have cancer. Biopsies are very subjective and depending upon
the method used, may be of little value. Modern medicine is set in
their ways and nearly always use biopsy as the first test for cancer.
later they use blood tests such as CA-125, among others, many of
which are themselves dubious in accuracy.
We need to understand that there exists a high level of unethical
behavior among doctors. Far too many are in medicine for financial
gain and they often take advantage of the ignorance of their
patients. This is why second and third opinions are so very
important. When going to a new doctor to compare the diagnosis do not
let the new doctor know why you are there but pretend to be a new
concerned patient. Many specialists only accept referrals which is
inherently biased and highly suspect they match stories to reaffirm
the original diagnosis for two reasons, one to exploit the patient
and two, to minimize the potential of litigation. An awful lot of
doctors are evil. Be a wise consumer and learn everything you can
about your condition. Question everything, if the Doc gets mad find
another doctor. Its your life, not his.
One favorite ploy they use is to pick on a local TV personality and
diagnose them as having cancer so that they appear to the public that
they have been cured when, in fact, they never had cancer in the
first place. I would be willing to bet that everyone who lives in a
major metropolitan area has known of a local personality or two who
successfully beaten the disease and are advocates to whatever medical
prattle presented to them. Pushing mammograms is a good example.
In my opinion, hCG and lactic acid levels in the blood are the best predictors. All
cancer produces hCG. When the first pregnancy testers came on the
market they were sensitive enough to detect about 94% of all cancers
because cancer and pregnancy produce the same identical hormone.
Shortly thereafter, the manufacturers raised the threshold levels of
the urine tests so that they would not pick up most early cancers.
These tests are still manufactured in the U.S. but are for export
only. They cannot be legally re-imported back into the U.S. Why? Come
on now think about it...
In my opinion, traditional cancer treatments don't work. As I see it, hMany
live longer without any treatment at all. Again, get Dr. Philip
Binzel's book. He had no reason to lie. He was hounded just like all
the other great doctors. To quote Harry Hoxsey's attorney: (not in
his exact words but close).
"It takes a lot of courage to hold yourself out as being able to
furnish medicines that can cure cancer and operate a big place in a
big city like Dallas. I don't believe a man, knowingly lying about it
could do it."
Those who survive from conventional treatments (who actually had
cancer) live not because of it, but in spite of it.
--- In cancercured@yahoogroups.com, szukipoo@... wrote:
>
> arlynsg@... writes:
> > And quite frankly, not everyone who uses only traditional
medicine dies from cancer. Some people are doing great afterwards.
> >
>
> most that I know who did traditional, have a lot of after effects.
One
> friend of mine had radiation for breast cancera and it destroyed
the muscles in her upper arms..she has no use of her arms/hands now.
It horrible.
>
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cancercured/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cancercured/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:cancercured-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:cancercured-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cancercured-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar