Re: [cancercured] leaving tumors alone

Thanks, Lillian. I'm going to look this up later today.

ar

On Tue, 6 May 2008 00:30:46 +0200, "Lillian Moscona" <limos99@gmail.com>
said:
> Hi all:
> I would like for people to have information on ECT ( ELectro cancer
> therapy) I have seen my doctor treat mnay women with breast cancer who
> have
> not lost thir breasts, or had a lumpectomy, and yet the tumor underwent
> necrosis.. In case you are interested I give you one of the sites whre
> you
> can read a bit about it...
> I personally woud never leave a couple of tumors close to the lymph nodes
> without trying to prvent the spreading of the cancer.. You need to make
> many
> changes in your lifestyle including those that do not correct things
> overnight..I would just be careful to take into account how much time I
> need
> to make those changes start working effectively, and decide if I do
> something with the tumors or not..
> It´s like an anorexic deciding on therpay or feeding the body..Sometimes
> you
> need to save the body in order to treat the rest..
> anyway the site is
> http://www.organobiotherapy.com/
> hope it provides some valuable information.
> Another thing I owud like to mention again... is that I find most people
> doing LDN in the US, and I had never heard of it in Europe...
> Yet I find noone talks about Viscum Album in this group And it is one of
> the
> most wide spread treatments for all cancers in Europe. At least 70% of
> all
> german patients include Viscum in their treatment of cancer even if they
> go
> through the traditional route.
> I have no idea if you can buy it in the USa .here it is made by WELEDA..
> Hope you all continue to be well and you preserve your high spirit!
> in light
> Lillian
>
> 2008/5/6 Arlyn Grant <arlynsg@123mail.org>:
>
> > Hi Rhoda,
> >
> > I agree. A fast moving cancer would cause a lot more trouble than a
> > slow moving cancer. A slow moving cancer may even burn itself out or
> > never cause trouble. However, it is my personal opinion that for
> > alternatives to work, the patient must have time. I believe that
> > removing a fast growing tumor gives the patient the time needed for
> > alternatives to work.
> >
> > This is just my opinion, by the way. And part of how I decided to how
> > to treat the cancer I had.
> >
> > ar
> >
> > On Mon, 5 May 2008 14:23:24 -0700, "Rhoda Mead" <firefly541@gmail.com<firefly541%40gmail.com>
> > >
> > said:
> > > It sure depends on the tumor. If it is fast-growing and aggressive, it
> > > must
> > > be removed to save life. If it's slow-growing, maybe not. Same with
> > > prostate
> > > cancer, some are 'watch and wait', and some most be removed quickly.
> > > Rhoda
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > --
> > Arlyn Grant
> > arlynsg@123mail.org <arlynsg%40123mail.org>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
--
Arlyn Grant
arlynsg@123mail.org

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cancercured/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cancercured/join

(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:cancercured-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:cancercured-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cancercured-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/