Re: [cancercured] leaving tumors alone

Hi Rhoda,

I agree. A fast moving cancer would cause a lot more trouble than a
slow moving cancer. A slow moving cancer may even burn itself out or
never cause trouble. However, it is my personal opinion that for
alternatives to work, the patient must have time. I believe that
removing a fast growing tumor gives the patient the time needed for
alternatives to work.

This is just my opinion, by the way. And part of how I decided to how
to treat the cancer I had.

ar

On Mon, 5 May 2008 14:23:24 -0700, "Rhoda Mead" <firefly541@gmail.com>
said:
> It sure depends on the tumor. If it is fast-growing and aggressive, it
> must
> be removed to save life. If it's slow-growing, maybe not. Same with
> prostate
> cancer, some are 'watch and wait', and some most be removed quickly.
> Rhoda
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
--
Arlyn Grant
arlynsg@123mail.org

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cancercured/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cancercured/join

(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:cancercured-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:cancercured-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cancercured-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/