A good rule of thumb in medical research is to watch Quackwatch. If QW attacks it is a good indication you have a good (alternative) product/procedure. A few years ago I researched QW and was amazed to discover how blatantly biased it (he) is. He's actually on the payroll of those who seek to suppress natural/alternative cures. I recommend you study that issue carefully so you will understand their Big Pharma/Big Medicine perspective.
I also did independent research on IPT. I would not hesitate to use it if it were appropriate to the circumstances. I think it's a powerful tool. But of course you must make up your own mind. BTW, what are the risks you are thinking of with IPT?
Best regards,
Phil
========================================================================
Phil,
The subject is very controversial.
IPT does not have of objective research.
http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/ipt.html
Use UKRAIN - no risks.
Jan
_____
From: Phillip Zachary
Jan,
Good question. I was referring to the latter [IPT=Insulin Potentiation
Therapy].
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cancercured/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cancercured/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:cancercured-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:cancercured-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cancercured-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar