term promulgated by the controllers of the conventional medical
paradigm. It has about as much validity as "evidence-based"
religion. To answer questions such as the validity of a strategy it
is best to ask oneself a question or two that might require some reflection:
How do you weigh the integrity of a non-compliant practitioner vs the
integrity of the reigning medical paradigm.
How do you weigh the skills of such a practitioner vs the
"standard-of-care" medicine of those who march in lock step to the
drum of the authorities.
IPT uses 10-15% of the usual amounts of chemo. Is there any chance
that the pharmaceutical companies would risk such a fatal loss of
income? Would health insurance companies feel kindly about a therapy
that would require expensive monitoring for decades? No, I suspect
that they would sooner give the patient double the routine chemo
doses in hopes that they can quickly close the file, after all, it
would be better serving their primary responsibility -- the
stockholders and, ahem, themselves.
By prescreening IPT candidates for suitability one can routinely see
amazing results. Very few IPT docs are oncologists, and I have seen
a bit of elitism mixed in with the justifiable pride as these IPT
docs outperform the traditional oncologists. I have also seen
ignorant docs who know NOTHING about cancer get exceptional results
by adding IPT to their practice. That must be most annoying to
establishment oncologists.
I do think that IPT is used too often in cases where the patient has
drug resistance from high-dose therapy. I also think that it is
overutilized when the patient lives too far away or otherwise can't
afford the many weeks of treatment needed.
BTW, Ukrain (which I also like) is a chemo in that it contains
thiotepa which is one of the older chemotherapies.
Vincent
At 10:09 AM 9/4/2008, you wrote:
>Phil,
>
>The subject is very controversial.
>
>IPT does not have of objective research.
>
><http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/ipt.html>http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/ipt.html
>
>http://www.givengain.com/cgi-bin/giga.cgi?cmd=cause_dir_news_item&cause_id=1056&news_id=31882&cat_id=0
>
>Use UKRAIN - no risks.
>
>Jan
>
>_____
>
>From: Phillip Zachary
>
>Jan,
>Good question. I was referring to the latter [IPT=Insulin Potentiation
>Therapy].
>
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG.
>Version: 8.0.136 / Virus Database: 270.6.16/1651 - Release Date:
>9/4/2008 6:57 AM
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cancercured/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cancercured/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:cancercured-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:cancercured-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cancercured-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar