> Hello Tad,
>
> What data there are on LDN makes it look like it works, to some degree
> about, 60% of the time. That's great, especially if you're in the 60%.
>
Mike- Thanks for the info, what other protocols can you recommend that
have a better track record? And have demonstrated the ability to stop
cancer for some people given a terminal diagnosis and restore quality
of life? Essiac and MGN3 have worked for Tad's aunt. It takes a lot
of dedication and persistence to continue in Essiac tea. MGN3 is
expensive. Would you bet your life on Artemix? IP6? Essiac? Budwig?
What? LDN is simple to follow, and not harmful. That cannot be said
of many options.
Many years ago I read a medical study where initial benign diagnoses
for sarcomas or carcinomas after biopsies and lack of treatment
allowing spread and metastases resulted in 50% fatality in 5 years. If
you possibly had metastases from a sarcoma or carcinoma that had been
given a false benign diagnosis and allowed to metastasize what would
you do? The temptation is to try several things which can raise a
conflict problem or at least the inability to determine which of
several is successful. I've been reading this forum for several
months and have not had any particular treatment really impress me.
Knock my sox off.
Nancy
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cancercured/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cancercured/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:cancercured-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:cancercured-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cancercured-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar