that the medical profession uses highly technical terms to cloak
their ignorance and I agree. This genetic trail that is the latest
fad does not reflect the actual cause of the disease. The fact that
this gene does this and that one does that is moot. It is not the
cell that triggers the disease, and yes, cells do all sorts of things
that, no doubt, can be measured. Just look at the results of all this
super research. Has modern scientific study done anything to stop
this disease. No! Nor will they. There has been no improvement in
cancer in the last 80 years, nothing! The freight train of medical
science jumped the tracks around world War II and has been going down
a dirt road ever since. Enough already!
This is a simple problem. Inadequate nutrition and poor drainage. The
cells suffocate in a soil of extreme pollution. The great cancer
clinics of Germany actually do cure cancer. They do it by changing
the terrain so as to make it hostile to the fungus that is cancer.
The body breaks down and reabsorbs the tumors as it does naturally
and has done so since life began on this planet. Plant all the
coconuts you wish in Toronto, no trees will grow. It isn't the seed,
its the soil...
The fungus of cancer was placed within all living entities so that
when it dies, it is devoured and returned to the soil from which it
came. Cancer is stupid, it thinks you are dead and what makes it
think that is the lack of oxygen. When oxygen levels are too low to
support normal life, the creatures of the afterlife emerge from the
tissues and reduce what was once living matter into compost. Food for
the next generation. From ashes to ashes...
--- In cancercured@yahoogroups.com, szukipoo@... wrote:
>
> Alcohol Consumption and Breast Cancer Risk in Postmenopausal Women
> http://www.hopkinsbreastcenter.org/artemis/200806/2.html
>
> [Excerpts from the article]
>
> One of the largest studies of its kind has found that alcohol is a
> substantial risk factor for development of the most common type of
breast cancer - the 70 percent of tumors that are classified as
positive for both the estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER+/PR+).
The findings were presented at the annual meeting of the American
Association for Cancer Research.
>
> Researchers report that even moderate alcohol consumption, defined
as one or two drinks per day, increased risk of developing this kind
of cancer, and the more a woman drank, the higher her risk. Compared
to women who did not drink at all, women who had three or more
glasses of alcohol daily had as much as a 51 percent increased risk
of ER+/PR+ breast cancer.
>
> In this study, the researchers reviewed data from the NIH-AARP Diet
and Health Study, which began in 1995. Lew and her colleagues
analyzed 184,418 postmenopausal women who enrolled in this cohort
study, and who answered questions about their daily alcohol
consumption. During an average of seven years of follow-up, they
found that 70 percent of women in the study drank alcohol; the
> average amount was a little less than a drink a day. Overall, the
authors found that moderate drinking in women increased risk of
developing breast cancer.
>
> SOURCES:
> American Association for Cancer Research 2008 Annual Meeting, April
12-16, 2008, San Diego, CA
> American Association for Cancer Research (http://www.aacr.org )
>
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cancercured/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cancercured/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:cancercured-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:cancercured-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cancercured-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar