escharotics. In fact, escharotics will completely devour all of the
cancer cells in the tumor without harming healthy tissue. Surgical
extirpation and even biopsy is very dangerous as aberrant cells are
often loosened and will therefore travel throughout the body causing
metastasis. Skin cancers, unlike internal cancers, are normally
localized and if removed early, they represent little risk of return
or metastasizing for that matter.
The 'profession' dislikes this form of treatment because it is cheap
and almost always 100% effective thus cheating the surgeon of his
blood money. They have adopted a form of escharotic treatment that
includes a surgical procedure called the 'Moh's Method' which
supposedly the surgeon individually picks out the cancer cells using
a microscope. Total BS, of course, but it makes money for them and
the patient is usually satisfied for the time being not knowing the
risk caused by the unnecessary surgery.
During the week to ten days that the eschar is forming, the skin
looks awful. The 'profession' loves to point out this horrible
disfigurement that the plant derived chemicals inflict on the poor
patient who is being chemically 'butchered' by the quack
practitioner. They never mention that upon completion of the healing,
there is seldom any scar where the cancer had been.
--- In cancercured@yahoogroups.com, goldenmike@... wrote:
>
> Hello Tad,
>
> This is Mike replying.
> You can use 470 nm blue led light on tumors. It only penetrates
about
> 1 mm at this wavelength. This would be good for skin cancers and
> maybe some skin mets or very superficial tumors. I think it is
worth
> trying. Don't use the red or near infrared. Those wavelenghths
> penetrate deepr, but may (possibly) stimulate cell growth.
> The dental lights come in a range of wavelengths between 420 and 500
> nm, so the 470 nm led arrays (blue) would be right in that range.
>
>
> Mike
>
> Monday, June 30, 2008, 4:37:58 AM, you wrote:
>
>
> TW> On Jun 29, 2008, at 11:07 AM, jm92562 wrote:
>
> >> http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/06/080624110831.htm
>
> TW> Jenny- thanks so much for posting this, I was feeling bad about
using
> TW> LED's on my husband's growths. My LED array has blue, red, and
> TW> infrared. Would it be better to only use the blue light and
not the
> TW> red and infrared? They have separate switches. One article
suggested
> TW> that infrared could promote angiogenesis. I need more
information
> TW> since an article about infrared saunas said they would decrease
cancer
> TW> growth.
>
> TW> Nancy
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> goldenmike mailto:goldenmike@...
>
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cancercured/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cancercured/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:cancercured-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:cancercured-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cancercured-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar