radiation? If you treated by these, then it means LDN does not work? Please
clarify.
Jim
In a message dated 6/25/2008 4:54:43 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
goldenmike@sbcglobal.net writes:
Hello jangrth,
Following is a "cut and paste" from the LDN site; (from 2004)
LDN Alone in the Treatment of Cancer.
Dr. Bihari now has 88 patients with cancer in complete or partial
remission whose improvement appears to be clearly attributable to LDN alone.
In contrast, the vast majority of patients who consult with him for cancer
tend to be on other concurrent treatments as well, which obviously interferes
with drawing conclusions about LDN's role in their improvement.
The successful LDN-only group includes five breast cancer patients,
one patient who had widespread metastatic renal cell carcinoma, three with
Hodgkin's disease and six with non-Hodgkin'Hodgkin's disease and six wit
some now on LDN for as long as four years, include a score of patients
with non-small cell lung cancer, as well as patients with ovarian cancer,
uterine cancer, pancreatic cancer (treated early), untreated prostate cancer,
colon cancer, malignant melanoma, throat cancer, primary liver cancer,
chronic
lymphocytic leukemia, multiple myeloma and some others.
Wednesday, June 25, 2008, 1:46:23 PM, you wrote:
j> Hello Mike,
j> You wrote: "What data there are on LDN makes it look like it works,
j> to some degree about, 60% of the time."
j> I've been curious about the data on LDN. From what I've read, it
j> seems that people taking LDN, even in the first study by Dr. Bihare
j> [sp?], were trying a variety of other treatments as well as LDN. I
j> read Dee's comments that she's also taking artemix, which seems like
j> a powerful cancer-fighter, and is on the Budwig diet.
j> Are there data showing that LDN alone has worked to stop cancer? If
j> so, please give us some details about it.
j> Jan
j> goldenmike wrote:
>> Hello Tad,
>> What data there are on LDN makes it look like it works, to some
j> degree about, 60% of the time. That's great, especially if you're in
j> the 60%.
>> I don't think there is a way to know ahead of time whether that is
>> true for any given individual. You can't even determine this
j> through
>> some expensive testing on endorphin rebound reactions. When
>> metenkephalin is given directly, not through LDN rebound, it is not
>> successful much more than 60% of the time. Which reminds me.....you
>> can buy metenkephelin from a company in Israel and administer it
>> directly, thus bypassing the whole LDN thing. Google it.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> Wednesday, June 25, 2008, 12:44:21 AM, you wrote:
>>
>> Dee, the moderator of the LDN forum, was given 4-9 months to live
j> and is now 16 months past that diagnosis. Obviously the LDN was
j> helping all along. The endorphin levels are increased by LDN
j> immediately, it just takes a while to totally stabilize the tumors,
j> but it is working on them all the time.
>>
--
Best regards,
goldenmike mailto:_goldenmike@sbcglobagolde_
(mailto:goldenmike@sbcglobal.net)
**************Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for
fuel-efficient used cars. (http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007)
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cancercured/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cancercured/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:cancercured-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:cancercured-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cancercured-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar