The "generational" part of cancer...? Best thing I read on that was
when Matthias Rath said, "Genetics may load the gun,(it does not
always), but lifestyle pulls the trigger." Having a genetic
predisposition to cancer does not at all means one will be dx'd with
the dis-ease. Living an anti-cancer lifestyle can go far toward
warding off the illness.
With regard to the rest of your reply, I have been thinking about how
to answer it so as not to cause offense or guilt. It appears to me
that to say smoking had nothing to do with the cancer and that one's
lungs were clean subsequent to smoking for any length of time is
overstating things. I believe it could well be that the immune system
had to work overtime cleaning the body of the contamination and
toxins from the smoking, so that it could have missed killing cancer
in another part of the body. And even if there was no cancer in the
lungs, they could hardly have been "clean." They would certainly have
been dirty from the smoke/tar etc in the cigarette smoke.
To speak of "many people who smoked for years but who died of old
age" does no one any good, in my opinion, and can do many people who
smoke a great disservice by giving them just one more excuse not to
quit a very dangerous, very dirty, very expensive habit.
Respectfully and with best wishes,
Elliot
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cancercured/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cancercured/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:cancercured-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:cancercured-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cancercured-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar