[cancercured] Re: tumor promotion with sodium bicarbonate

The human body is quite complex and the theories out there just help us in understanding but can't answer all questions in the vivo. Experiments in mice wouldn't justify the results in human beings. When a therapy as simple as NaHCO3 is put forward it is rejected for the simple reason that it would become a home remedy.

I am trying to explain that the complex machanism of alkalinity and Ph with NaHcO3 is not the issue here and there may be tons of study on that, and few intellectuals are unable to catch simple things as cancer in direct collision with sodium bicarbonate. I would like to know from anyone in the list if any paper has been done on the results of DIRECT CONTACT OF NAHCO3 with the malignant tissue. I would appreciate it and not anyone again borrowing and blowing up with the alkalanity-ph-cancer issues, we are talking about the fungus-cancer connection here and not ph-cancer connection.

Whether or not hyperventilating should raise alkalanity as a physiological response makes no sense in cancer pathology. You would die if you hyperventilate for 24 hours. Controlled alkalosis in cancer patients deaths are not known. An open mind approach is needed and if results are there about direct contact of cancer mass with the NaHC03, why doesn't anyone do research on this and come out with more defined protocol. Sure, fear is the factor here that may blow up big pharma and the cancer industry. So the solution: Snub the results before it takes over. Simple!!! Would like to know/Figure it out- Dr.Simoncini approach to research centers and institutes to carry out trials with his protocols were turned down.

Simply posting lengthy unrelated confusing papaers just to prove someone is wrong when results are always there makes no sense. Do some digging, if you find any research paper about the study of histochemical reactions of cancer tissue in direct contact with NaHCo3, post it and I would appreciate it rather than some misdirecting, unrelated documents like ph-alkalinity-hyperventilation-e.t.c, which has no relevance in Dr.Simoncini protocol. Yes,I understand bitter truth is hard to assimilate after going through previous posts on the subject.

Rahul

Mon, 3/31/08, VGammill wrote:
No one on the list has addressed the lack of
data in support of Dr. Simoncini's claims. No
one wants to address the basic science as so well
presented by Dr. Simoncini's own Italian
colleagues (below). The abstracts that I have
posted are not intended as a refutation of
Simoncini. They do show that the relationship of
pH and cancer is quite complex.

It is unnecessary for clinicians to understand
the chemistry that would buttress their
claims. It is necessary for them to show their
raw data in an intelligible form -- if they want
the respect of the professional world. This is
all the more important when one's claims run
counter to conventional science and understanding...........

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cancercured/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cancercured/join

(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:cancercured-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:cancercured-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cancercured-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/