Report comes from a group of oncologists in Australia who studied the
matter for several years, and came to the conclusion that chemo itself
is at most 2.3 % (etc) effective.
It's available in the medical archives in the US, but you didn't read it
in any US newspapers.
Dave
Here is the summary..
======= ============= ============= =================
This message contains search results from the National Center for
Biotechnology Information (NCBI <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov>) at the
U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM <http://www.nlm.nih.gov>). Do not
reply directly to this message
*Sender's message:* Dave Chemo ineffective
Sent on: Thu Dec 13 20:51:42 2007
Select 15630849
Department of Radiation Oncology, Northern Sydney Cancer Centre,
Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
gmorgan1@bigpond.net.au
AIMS: The debate on the funding and availability of cytotoxic drugs
raises questions about the contribution of curative or adjuvant
cytotoxic chemotherapy to survival in adult cancer patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We undertook a literature search for
randomised clinical trials reporting a 5-year survival benefit
attributable solely to cytotoxic chemotherapy in adult malignancies.
The total number of newly diagnosed cancer patients for 22 major
adult malignancies was determined from cancer registry data in
Australia and from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results
data in the USA for 1998. For each malignancy, the absolute number
to benefit was the product of (a) the total number of persons with
that malignancy; (b) the proportion or subgroup(s) of that
malignancy showing a benefit; and (c) the percentage increase in
5-year survival due solely to cytotoxic chemotherapy. The overall
contribution was the sum total of the absolute numbers showing a
5-year survival benefit expressed as a percentage of the total
number for the 22 malignancies. RESULTS: The overall contribution of
curative and adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in
adults was estimated to be 2.3% in Australia and 2.1% in the USA.
CONCLUSION: As the 5-year relative survival rate for cancer in
Australia is now over 60%, it is clear that cytotoxic chemotherapy
only makes a minor contribution to cancer survival. To justify the
continued funding and availability of drugs used in cytotoxic
chemotherapy, a rigorous evaluation of the cost-effectiveness and
impact on quality of life is urgently required.
PMID: 15630849 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Entrez PubMed Results
Item 1 of 1
*1: *Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2004 Dec;16(8):549-60.Cited in PMC
<http://www.pubmedcentral.gov/tocrender.fcgi?action=cited&tool=pubmed&pubmedid=15630849&itool=Email.EmailReport.Pubmed_ReportSelector.Pubmed_HVAbstractPlus&ordinalpos=1>,
LinkOut
<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Cmd=ShowLinkOut&Db=PubMed&TermToSearch=15630849&ordinalpos=1&itool=Email.EmailReport.Pubmed_ReportSelector.Pubmed_HVAbstractPlus>
Comment in:
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2005 Jun;17(4):294.
<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=PubMed&Cmd=ShowDetailView&TermToSearch=15997929&ordinalpos=1&itool=Email.EmailReport.Pubmed_ReportSelector.Pubmed_HVAbstractPlus>
The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in
adult malignancies.
*Morgan G*
<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=PubMed&Cmd=Search&Term=%22Morgan%20G%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=Email.EmailReport.Pubmed_ReportSelector.Pubmed_HVAbstractPlus>,
*Ward R*
<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=PubMed&Cmd=Search&Term=%22Ward%20R%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=Email.EmailReport.Pubmed_ReportSelector.Pubmed_HVAbstractPlus>,
*Barton M*
<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=PubMed&Cmd=Search&Term=%22Barton%20M%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=Email.EmailReport.Pubmed_ReportSelector.Pubmed_HVAbstractPlus>.
=========== ============= ============== ===========
On 5/24/2008 10:40:22 PM, angel z. nest
(toreadpeoplehealthinfo@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hello John,
>
> Would you please tell me where you get this 3% cure rate figure?
>
> I've seen it around for a while and really would like to get my
> oncologists input on it but must have the source/origin of this data...
>
> Please tell,
> Angel
>
>
> --- In cancercured@yahoogroups.com, "John Magal" <johnmagal@...> wrote:
> >
> > Karl
> > my definition of alternative medicine differs from yours; in my book
> > it is medicine without the use of products of the pharmaceutical
> > indust
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cancercured/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cancercured/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:cancercured-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:cancercured-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cancercured-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar