Rabu, 02 April 2008

[cancercured] Re: adrenal cancer liver mets

Hi, I think that the two are not necessarily comparable, meaning that
they have different methods of action.
As I undersatnd it, pau d'arco is more of an immune stimulant and
graviola is more of an ATP inhibitor. Maybe someone could provide
correction if I'm wrong.
Graviola would be more comparable to pawpaw. Pawpaw is supposed to be
the more potent one of the two. I hope this helps. KC


--- In cancercured@yahoogroups.com, "margie.jeanne"
<margie.jeanne@...> wrote:
>Have you heard about the effectiveness of pau d'arco or graviola?
Someone told me about it tonight on the phone, but didn't know if
either has a proven track record or if one is better than the other.
Thanks for your help.
> Margie
>
>
>


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cancercured/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cancercured/join

(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:cancercured-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:cancercured-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cancercured-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Tidak ada komentar: